Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 10:20

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Teases Big Improvements for Future Updates - Push Square
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Turning carbon dioxide into fuel just got easier, thanks to acid bubbles - Tech Xplore
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why do narcissist move on so easily?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Eum labore eaque vel aspernatur magnam modi rem.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why should we share our wife with others?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What are some tips for a girl with low self-esteem to start dating?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
New Research Reveals That Humans Are Seasonal Animals - SciTechDaily
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.